Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of geographic areas that are designated as Air Quality Maintenance Areas and Nonattainment Areas for the criteria pollutant PM10 (particulate matter). A criteria pollutant means any of the six pollutants set out by the Clean Air Act (sulfur oxides, particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and lead) for which the EPA has promulgated standards in 40 CFR 50.4 through 50.12 (July, 1993).
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={3DF9AFBA-9D3B-4FD6-9BEA-E97D34899A25}
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/AQ_MaintenanceAreas.zip
Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of geographic areas that are designated as Air Quality Maintenance Areas and Nonattainment Areas for the criteria pollutant OZONE. A criteria pollutant means any of the six pollutants set out by the Clean Air Act (sulfur oxides, particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and lead) for which the EPA has promulgated standards in 40 CFR 50.4 through 50.12 (July, 1993).
Metadata http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={37A8F783-3071-4712-8469-7F01C3F3E61E}
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/AQ_MaintenanceAreas.zip
Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of geographic areas that are designated as Air Quality Maintenance Areas and Nonattainment Areas for the criteria pollutant CARBON MONOXIDE. A criteria pollutant means any of the six pollutants set out by the Clean Air Act (sulfur oxides, particulate matter, ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and lead) for which the EPA has promulgated standards in 40 CFR 50.4 through 50.12 (July, 1993).
Metadata http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={47F09360-F134-47F7-A87C-6AE7C0075142}
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/AQ_MaintenanceAreas.zip
Description: Land Management derived from BLM Ownership_poly: This theme portrays information representing fee land title and land manager of lands located in Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={9B644E0F-7A7D-4124-A50F-6B35C05626AE}
Download
http://www.odf.state.or.us/gis/data/Ownership/2015_LandManagementDraft.gdb.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Bureau of Land Management USDI edited by the Oregon Department of Forestry
Description: This data represents the State of Oregon city limit boundaries. Each city limit is defined as a continuous area within the statutory boundary of an incorporated city, which is the smallest subdivision of an annexed area. It is represented as spatial data (polygon with label point).
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B607B9A8E-3187-4380-A7A3-71C5048CD600%7D
Download
ftp://ftp.gis.oregon.gov/transportation/citylim_2016.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Geographic Information Services (GIS) Unit, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT)
Description: Boundaries for Oregon's Councils of Governments. Note, this dataset does not include Portland Metro's boundary since Metro is not a COG, but a metropolitan service district.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B0D6B4436-39FB-4480-B8C8-1B8F64C4EE41%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/Oregon_COG_boundaries.zip
Description: This theme shows line and polygon representation of the jurisdictional and cartographic county perimeters for Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={361C06FE-E9DE-4E24-A72E-280FB386A771}
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/orcnty2015.zip
Description: Oregon's enterprise zones offer a unique resource to Oregon communities, and an excellent opportunity for businesses growing or locating in Oregon. Primarily, enterprise zones exempt businesses from local property taxes on new investments for a specified amount of time, which varies among the different zone programs.Sponsored by municipal or tribal governments, an enterprise zone typically serves as a focal point for local development efforts. There are currently 68 enterprise zones creating better opportunities for business investment across Oregon: 53 rural and 15 urban. For local governments interested in obtaining, retaining or amending a zone, guidance is available on the Business Oregon Enterprise Zones webpage. Metadata http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={E3E1E1CA-5B15-4CC3-BF98-B5766F44EF3B}
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EnterpriseZones2015.zip
Description: Polygons delineating Oregon Department of Forestry's Protection from Fire Program Districts. The ODF Protection Districts are boundaries described in statute. Private and some federal lands within the boundaries are protected from fire by ODF. Most of the boundaries have been adjusted to the legal descriptions for the Protection District boundaries compiled by the Protection From Fire Program. The most recent update broke the Cascade District into North and South Cascade Districts. The boundary is a proposed boundary and may be subject to change when finally adopted.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={64CFC6D4-BB20-45E5-8A89-87BE88A0D32B}
Download
http://www.odf.state.or.us/gis/data/Boundaries/ODF_FPD_Export.gdb.zip
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Name: Groundwater Drinking Water Source Areas (2015)
Display Field: filename
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This layer includes Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Oregon Health Authority (OHA) Drinking Water Program Source Water Assessment drinking water source area results for community (C), non-transient non-community (NTNC), transient non-community (TNC), and some state-regulated (SP) public water systems (PWS) for groundwater public water systems that were active in June 1999 (when Oregon's Source Water Assessment Plan was approved by EPA). Data is updated and modified as needed.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B6A1EC8DD-8B68-4483-8CC5-01C57B6A2C27%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/GroundwaterDWSA_2015.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Most original groundwater well, infiltration gallery, and spring drinking water source areas were established by the Oregon Health Authority ((OHA); formerly OR Dept. of Human Service), Drinking Water Program-Springfield Office under the direction of the Drinking Water Protection Groundwater Coordinator. Data includes "community", "nontransient noncommunity", and "transient noncommunity" public water supply sources. Limited "state-regulated" sources are also included. The combined GIS spatial data file of all wells, infiltration galleries, and springs was developed by Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality/Water Quality Division/Drinking Water Protection.
Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of a geographic area that is designated as a Groundwater Management Area for Malheur County, Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BAB957B8B-4F72-44B6-8FE9-02EB4F1DD6F5%7D
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/GW_ManagementAreas.zip
Name: Groundwater Management Areas Willamette (2007)
Display Field: name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of a geographic area that is designated as a Groundwater Management Area for the Southern Willamette Valley in Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BAB957B8B-4F72-44B6-8FE9-02EB4F1DD6F5%7D
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/GW_ManagementAreas.zip
Name: Groundwater Management Areas Umatilla (2007)
Display Field: name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This polygon layer contains a spatial representation of a geographic area that is designated as a Groundwater Management Area for the Lower Umatilla Basin in Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BAB957B8B-4F72-44B6-8FE9-02EB4F1DD6F5%7D
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/GW_ManagementAreas.zip
Description: This geographic feature data is a product of the 76th Oregon Legislative Session Redistricting process. These are the approved Congressional districts. Every 10 years the Legislature is tasked with reassigning census units to new districts to balance the population. These boundaries are subject court challenge. Verify district accuracy by checking with the Oregon Secretary of State's Office or Oregon Department of Administrative Services- Geospatial Enterprise Office before conducting any legally binding analysis.
Metadata: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={3F9789B7-4200-493B-9372-058153660DAC}
Download:
http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/shapefile/k100/2010house_districts.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Wayne Coffey, GIS Coordinator for Oregon Redistricting, Legislative Administration Committee Services.
http://www.leg.state.or.us/
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Federal highway and transit statutes require, as a condition for spending federal highway or transit funds in urbanized areas, the designation of MPOs, which have responsibility for planning, programming and coordination of federal highway and transit investments. The federally designated MPOs are made up of large urban MPOs (population areas greater than 200,000): the Portland regional area, the Salem/Keizer area, and the Eugene/Springfield area; and small urban MPOs (population areas between 50,000 - 200,000): the Medford/Rogue Valley area, the Cities of Corvallis/Philomath, the City of Bend, Albany area, Middle Rogue, and Walla Walla Valley. Geographic Information Services (GIS) Unit, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2013.
Metadata: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B039CD9B7-D348-488D-9218-39105BBDA43E%7D
Download: http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/mpo_2013.zip
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This feature class includes point locations and attribute data for all child care and early learning facilities found within the state of Oregon. The child care facilities data was derived and compiled at Oregon State University's College of Public Health and Human Sciences. The GIS dataset was created at Oregon's Department of Human Services/Oregon Health Authority, Office of Forecasting, Research & Analysis. This dataset is based on child care facility locations for the year 2015.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B31747586-6597-424A-BBD4-E9D1D3ED482F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EDUCATIONAL_DATA_2015_PUBLIC.gdb.zip
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Human Services/Oregon Health Authority, Office of Forecasting, Research & Analysis
Description: This feature class is Oregon's complete educational locations point dataset. The dataset includes K-12 public schools,established under the laws of the state and regulated by local authorities in various districts, counties or towns, maintained at the public expense by taxation, and open to residents' children. School district and education service district offices are also represented with regards to public education. Oregon K-12 private schools, colleges, universities, and career schools are also included in this dataset.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B31747586-6597-424A-BBD4-E9D1D3ED482F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EDUCATIONAL_DATA_2015_PUBLIC.gdb.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Human Services & Oregon Health Authority (Office of Forecasting, Research and Analysis)
Description: This feature class defines all attendence boundaries and associated public school administrative boundaries for the state of Oregon. This is a composite polygon layer consisting of educational service district boundaries, school district boundaries, elementary school attendance boundaries, middle school attendance boundaries, and high school attendance boundaries. Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B31747586-6597-424A-BBD4-E9D1D3ED482F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EDUCATIONAL_DATA_2015_PUBLIC.gdb.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Human Services & Oregon Health Authority (Office of Forecasting, Research and Analysis)
Description: This feature class defines all public charter school attendence boundaries found in the state of Oregon.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B31747586-6597-424A-BBD4-E9D1D3ED482F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EDUCATIONAL_DATA_2015_PUBLIC.gdb.zip
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Human Services & Oregon Health Authority (Office of Forecasting, Research and Analysis)
Description: This dataset includes locations of school property and other areas involved in student instruction activities found in the state of Oregon. The school footprint locations are represented as polygons and include public and private K-12 schools, public school administrative offices, colleges and university campus', and career schools.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B31747586-6597-424A-BBD4-E9D1D3ED482F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/EDUCATIONAL_DATA_2015_PUBLIC.gdb.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Dept. of Human Services and Oregon Health Authority (Office of Forecasting, Research & Analysis)
Description: This geographic feature data is a product of the 76th Oregon Legislative Session Redistricting process. These are the approved Congressional districts. Every 10 years the Legislature is tasked with reassigning census units to new districts to balance the population. These boundaries are subject court challenge. Verify district accuracy by checking with the Oregon Secretary of State's Office or Oregon Department of Administrative Services- Geospatial Enterprise Office before conducting any legally binding analysis.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={5D635644-550D-46A6-ACBC-C8EA4DCA5B82}
Download
http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/shapefile/k100/2010senate_districts.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Wayne Coffey, GIS Coordinator for Oregon Redistricting, Legislative Administration Committee Services.
http://www.leg.state.or.us/
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Name: Soil and Water Conservation Districts (2014)
Display Field: swcd_name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This theme depiciton of the legal jurisdiction of the Oregon's Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCD). It also show the area that are excempt from being in a SWCD
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BB79A5FD2-E4C3-417B-8210-6DDDC014158F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/ODA_Data_2014_15.zip
Name: Soil and Water Conservation District Zones (2015)
Display Field: swcd_name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This theme depicts of the legal jurisdiction of the zones within each Oregon's Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCD). Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B49D58C71-E906-46E9-9DA2-3F07F7E0A75F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/ODA_Data_2014_15.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Agriculture and each Soil and Water Conservation District
Name: Surface Water Drinking Water Source Areas (2015)
Display Field: pws_name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This map includes Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and Oregon Health Authority’ (OHA) Drinking Water Program Source Water Assessment results for community and non-transient non-community public water systems (PWS) for surface water systems that were active in June 1999 (when Oregon's Source Water Assessment Plan was approved by EPA). Subsequently, post-1999 systems have been added including some non-community systems.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BBD6FD933-A183-4A4C-8314-AF1FC4613CB7%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/SurfacewaterDWSA_2015.zip
Copyright Text: All original surface water source area files and combined GIS spatial data files were developed or established by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division/Drinking Water Protection Program.
Description: This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. Approximate real property boundaries for lands owned or managed by OPRD. The purpose is to serve a base department layer.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B9ED99BB8-3640-4819-86F8-0CBFD377124F%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/OregonStateParks.zip
Description: This data layer is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework. The Structural Fire Protection Districts represent the boundaries of urban and rural structural fire districts. The layer was created cooperatively with the Oregon State Fire Marshal's office. The layer contains the Urban and Rural Fire Protection District boundary lines as well as attribute information (which is updated on a quarterly basis by the SFM office). Construction of the layer started prior to 2000 using line work collected with heads-up digitizing of Rural Fire Protection District boundaries from hard copy maps provided by the RFPDs and from ODF Protection Maps. In 2001 an effort was made to contact urban and rural fire districts whose boundaries were not included in the first digitizing effort. The boundaries for those districts that responded were incorporated into the protection district layer (not all districts responded so not all districts are represented in the theme). The name of the theme was changed from Rural to Structural to make it more representative of the data.
Metadata http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BAEC94750-D84C-4A85-A729-1F0275978A6D%7D
Download http://www.odf.state.or.us/gis/data/Boundaries/RFPD.zip
Color: [104, 104, 104, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Arial Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This polygon theme contains a spatial representation of geographic areas that are designated as motor vehicle inspection boundaries based on Oregon Administrative Rules 340-204-0080 and 340-204-0010.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B03A68AA7-EF62-4CCE-873E-F454FE67B8B2%7D
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/VIP_Boundaries.zip
Description: This theme delineates Urban Growth Boundaries (UGBs) in the state of Oregon. Oregon land use laws limit development outside of urban growth boundaries. The line work was created by various sources including the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Metro Regional Council of Governments (Metro), county and city GIS departments, and the Oregon Department of Administrative Services - Geospatial Enterprise Office (DAS-GEO).Urban growth boundaries (UGBs) are lines drawn on planning and zoning maps to show where a city expects to experience growth for the next 20 years. UGBs were established under Oregon Statewide Planning Goals in 1973 by the Oregon State Legislature (Senate Bill 100). Goal 14 specifically deals with UGBs (OAR 660-15-0000(4)). Other specific ORS that relate to the designation and delineation of UGBs are: 197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary and designating urban reserve area subject to periodic review.A city with a population of 2,500 or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve areas under ORS 195.145 shall submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. [1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10]and 197.628 Periodic review; policy; conditions that indicate need for periodic review.(1) It is the policy of the State of Oregon to require the periodic review of comprehensive plans and land use regulations in order to respond to changes in local, regional and state conditions to ensure that the plans and regulations remain in compliance with the statewide planning goals adopted pursuant to ORS 197.230, and to ensure that the plans and regulations make adequate provision for needed housing, employment, transportation and public facilities and services.Determining UGBs in Oregon is done based on input from city and county governments. Such special districts as public safety and utilities also participate because they provide important services. Local citizens and other interested people also provide input at public hearings, and by voting. After local governments determine the UGB, the state Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) reviews it for consistency with Goal 14. One of the major tasks in initially creating the UGB layer was to create an effective process for identifying, determining and documenting data sources for the layer. This included examining numerous existing data sources prepared and compiled by local and state jurisdictional bodies. Maps of boundaries were forwarded to several stakeholders for review, data requests were made directly to the GIS coordinators, planners, or senior administrators. Overall, local contacts had a high response rate. The initial assumption was that the local files were more accurate than DCLDs so a map was made of each respective UGB on file in 2006 and sent to the corresponding jurisdiction and county. This conclusion was based on the local files being: 1) typically linked to such official and legal boundary as city limits, or cadastral data, 2) the locals are the originators of the data which was submitted to DLCD, and 3) local planning agencies and county assessors typically maintain these data in high-resolution digital GIS data files. Where local authorities provided data, we revised boundaries to reflect a combination of DLCD files and local data. Differences were noted, documented and corrected based on mutual agreement from both DLCD acknowledged files and local authorities. If the county/local planning authority did not provide any data, it is assumed that the boundary on file was correct and the legal definition of UGBs for their respective areas were the attached digital file, until the local jurisdiction re-submits data to DLCD for approval, or to provide justification that DCLD information is incomplete (i.e,. other DLCD approved amendments).
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B394740B8-FFFC-44A7-8B37-47CA03ACB34A%7D
Download
http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/shapefile/k24/UGB_2015.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: This dataset was originally created in 2004 at the Oregon Department of Employment under a grant from the Oregon Geographic Information Council (OGIC). In 2006, DLCD partnered with the University of Oregon's Infographics Lab and ODOT for another comprehensive update to the data following as closely as possible the methodology followed in the 2004 project. In 2008 DLCD took stewardship of the data and began a refined methodology necessary to bring the UGB data in line with other statewide framework elements through the OGIC data standards process. UGBs were optimized with reliance on cadastral tax lot data acquired through the Oregon Department of Revenue ORMAP project. Every jurisdiction's entire UGB was reviewed against County records, City records and DLCD records. Discrepancies were verified against acknowledged plan amendments and/or City Ordinances.
Name: U.S. Congressional District Boundaries (2011)
Display Field: District_N
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This geographic feature data is a product of the 76th Oregon Legislative Session Redistricting process. These are the approved Congressional districts. Every 10 years the Legislature is tasked with reassigning census units to new districts to balance the population. These boundaries are subject court challenge. Verify district accuracy by checking with the Oregon Secretary of State's Office or Oregon Department of Administrative Services- Geospatial Enterprise Office before conducting any legally binding analysis.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B6A2FC9EC-6FF7-4219-A404-5D8FA61B2373%7D
Download
http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/shapefile/k100/2010congress_districts.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Wayne Coffey, GIS Coordinator for Oregon Redistricting, Legislative Administration Committee Services.
http://www.leg.state.or.us/
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: Defines the boundaries of the watershed council jurisdictions within the state of Oregon effective May 2014.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B8091C70C-2E73-47D4-BA0F-8D8D0C5647C0%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/Oregon_Watershed_Councils_2014.zip
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: As of April 18, 2014 this feature class contains zoning data from 156 local jursdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions.Jurisdictions included in the 20140418 version of the statewide zoning geodatabase:Cities:Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Bonanza, Brownsville, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Damascus, Dayton, Donald, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Eagle Point, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Forest Grove, Garibaldi, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hood River, Hubbard, Independence, Jacksonville, Johnson City, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lowell, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Millersburg, Milwaukie, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Myrtle Creek, Nehalem, Newberg, North Plains, Oakridge, Oregon City, Philomath, Phoenix, Portland, Prineville, Redmond, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Rufus, Salem, Scappoose, Scio, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Springfield, St. Helens, Stayton, Sublimity, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill.Counties:Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Wasco County, Washington County, Yamhill County.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B9966F34D-71E7-4BD5-A91E-0D2757C91EBF%7D
Download
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/OregonZoning_09_24_2014.zip
Description: The Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is a geodatabase, managed by USGS GAP, that illustrates and describes public land ownership, management and other conservation lands, including voluntarily provided privately protected areas. The State, Regional and LCC geodatabases contain two feature classes. The PADUS1_3_FeeEasement feature class and the national MPA feature class. Legitimate and other protected area overlaps exist in the full inventory, with Easements loaded on top of Fee. Parcel data within a protected area are dissolved in this file that powers the PAD-US Viewer. As overlaps exist, GAP creates separate analytical layers to summarize area statistics for "GAP Status Code" and "Owner Name". Contact the PAD-US Coordinator for more information. The lands included in PAD-US are assigned conservation measures that qualify their intent to manage lands for the preservation of biological diversity and to other natural, recreational and cultural uses; managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase includes: 1) Geographic boundaries of public land ownership and voluntarily provided private conservation lands (e.g., Nature Conservancy Preserves); 2) The combination land owner, land manager, management designation or type, parcel name, GIS Acres and source of geographic information of each mapped land unit 3) GAP Status Code conservation measure of each parcel based on USGS National Gap Analysis Program (GAP) protection level categories which provide a measurement of management intent for long-term biodiversity conservation 4) IUCN category for a protected area's inclusion into UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre's World Database for Protected Areas. IUCN protected areas are defined as, "A clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values" and are categorized following a classification scheme available through USGS GAP; 5) World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA) Site Codes linking the multiple parcels of a single protected area in PAD-US and connecting them to the Global Community. As legitimate and other overlaps exist in the combined inventory GAP creates separate analytical layers to obtain area statistics for "GAP Status Code" and "Owner Name". PAD-US version 1.3 Combined updates include: 1) State, local government and private protected area updates delivered September 2011 from PAD-US State Data Stewards: CO (Colorado State University), FL (Florida Natural Areas Inventory), ID (Idaho Fish and Game), MA (The Commonwealth's Office of Geographic Information Systems, MassGIS), MO (University of Missouri, MoRAP), MT (Montana Natural Heritage Program), NM (Natural Heritage New Mexico), OR (Oregon Natural Heritage Program), VA (Department of Conservation and Recreation, Virginia Natural Heritage Program). 2) Select local government (i.e. county, city) protected areas (3,632) across the country (to complement the current PAD-US inventory) aggregated by the Trust for Public Land (TPL) for their Conservation Almanac that tracks the conservation finance movement across the country. 3) A new Date of Establishment field that identifies the year an area was designated or otherwise protected, attributed for 86% of GAP Status Code 1 and 2 protected areas. Additional dates will be provided in future updates. 4) A national wilderness area update from wilderness.net 5) The Access field that describes public access to protected areas as defined by data stewards or categorical assignment by Primary Designation Type. . The new Access Source field documents local vs. categorical assignments. See the PAD-US Standard Manual for more information: gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus 6) The transfer of conservation measures (i.e. GAP Status Codes, IUCN Categories) and documentation (i.e. GAP Code Source, GAP Code Date) from PAD-US version 1.2 or categorical assignments (see PAD-US Standard) when not provided by data stewards 7) Integration of non-sensitive National Conservation Easement Database (NCED) easements from August 2011, July 2012 with PAD-US version 1.2 easements. Duplicates were removed, unless 'Stacked' = Y and multiple easements exist. 8) Unique ID's transferred from NCED or requested for new easements. NCED and PAD-US are linked via Source UID in the PAD-US version 1.3 Easement feature class. 9) Official (member and eligible) MPAs from the NOAA MPA Inventory (March 2011, www.mpa.gov) translated into the PAD-US schema with conservation measures transferred from PAD-US version 1.2 or categorically assigned to new protected areas. Contact the PAD-US Coordinator for documentation of categorical GAP Status Code assignments for MPAs. 10) Identified MPA records that overlap existing protected areas in the PAD-US Fee feature class (i.e. PADUS Overlap field in MPA feature class). For example, many National Wildlife Refuges and National Parks are also MPAs and are represented in the PAD-US MPA and Fee feature classes.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={1A95CDE7-7C27-46FF-9E02-785C8AAF6DB7}
Download
http://orbic.pdx.edu/documents/OR_stewardship.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: ORBIC Stewardship Geodatabase. December 2013. Modified from: US Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program (GAP). November 2012. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PADUS), version 1.4.
own_name
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Owner Name, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[0100: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)]
, [0110: Bureau of Land Management (BLM)]
, [0115: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (DOI)]
, ...54 more...
)
loc_own
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Local Owner, length: 100
)
status
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Status, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[Designated: Designated - Legally or administratively decreed]
, [Proposed: Proposed - local government level approval]
, [Other: Other - Site is recognized in a manner not otherwise classified]
, ...1 more...
)
state_nm
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: State Name, length: 50
, Coded Values:
[10: Delaware]
, [11: District of Columbia]
, [12: Florida]
, ...58 more...
)
Description: This statewide grid was created by combining four independently-generated datasets: one for western Oregon (USGS zones 2 and 7), and two for eastern Oregon (USGS zones 8 and 9; forested and non-forested lands), and selected wetland types from the Oregon Wetlands geodatabase. The landcover grid for zones 2 and 7 was produced using a modification of Breiman's Random Forest classifier to model landcover. Multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+, 1999-2003) and digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform, aspect, etc.) were utilized to build two predictive models for the forested landcover classes, and the nonforested landcover classes. The grids resulting from the models were then modified to improve the distribution of the following classes: volcanic systems and wetland vegetation. Along the eastern edge, the sagebrush systems were modified to help match with the map for the adjacent region. Additional classes were then layered on top of the modified models from other sources. These include disturbed classes (harvested and burned), cliffs, riparian, and NLCD's developed, agriculture, and water classes. A validation for forest classes was performed on a withheld of the sample data to assess model performance. Due to data limitations, the nonforest classes were evaluated using the same data that were used to build the original nonforest model. Two independent grids were combined to map landcover in adjacent zones 8 and 9. Tree canopy greater than 10% (from NLCD 2001), complemented with a disturbance grid, served as a mask to delineate forested areas. A grid of non-forested areas was extracted from a larger, regional grid (Sagemap) created using decision tree classifier and other techniques. Multi-season satellite imagery (Landsat ETM+, 1999-2003) and digital elevation model (DEM) derived datasets (e.g. elevation, landform, aspect, etc.) were utilized to derive rule sets for the various landcover classes. Eleven mapping areas, each characterized by similar ecological and spectral characteristics, were modeled independently of one another and mosaicked. An internal validation for modeled classes was performed on a withheld 20% of the sample data to assess model performance. The portion of this original grid corresponding to USGS map zones 8 and 9 was extracted and split into three mapping areas (one for USGS zone 8, two for USGS zone 9: Northern Basin and Range in the south, Blue Mountains in the north) and modified to improve the distribution of the following classes: cliffs, subalpine zone, dunes, lava flows, silver sagebrush, ash beds, playas, scabland, and riparian vegetation. Agriculture and urban areas were extracted from NLCD 2001. A forest grid was generated using Gradient Nearest Neighbor (GNN) imputation process. GNN uses multivariate gradient modeling to integrate data from regional grids of field plots with satellite imagery and mapped environmental data. A suite of fine-scale plot variables is imputed to each pixel in a digital map, and regional maps can be created for most of the same vegetation attributes available from the field plots. However, due to lack of sampling plots in the southern half of zone 9, the GNN model proved unreliable there; forest data from Landfire were used instead. To compensate for known under-representation of wetlands, selected wetland types from the Oregon Wetlands Geodatabase (version 2009-1030) were converted to raster and overlaid (replaced) pixel value assignments from the previous steps just detailed. See Process Steps for more information. The ecological systems were crosswalked to landcover (based on Oregon landcover standard, modified from NLCD 2001) and to wildlife habitats (based on integrated habitats used in the Oregon, Washington, and Idaho Dept of Fish & Wildlife conservation strategies). These codes and names are included in the value attribute table provided with the ecological systems grid.
Metadata: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B776E6118-422B-429C-8C30-24F289F9F192%7D
Download:
http://navigator.state.or.us/sdl/data/oregon_veg.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Jimmy Kagan Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center 1322 SE Morrison Street, Portland, OR 97214-2423 Eric Nielsen Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center 1322 SE Morrison Street, Portland, OR 97214-2423 Claudine Tobalske Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center 1322 SE Morrison Street, Portland, OR 97214-2423 Janet Ohmann Forest Science, Oregon State University 354-1 Forest Sciences Lab Corvallis, OR 97331 Emilie Grossmann Forest Science, Oregon State University 321 Richardson Hall Corvallis, OR 97331-5752 John Bauer The Wetlands Conservancy Tualatin, OR Matthew Gregory Forest Science, Oregon State University 321 Richardson Hall Corvallis, OR 97331-5752 Jon Hak Natureserve 4001 Discovery Drive Boulder, CO 80303 Steve Hanser USGS, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Snake River Field Station, 970 Lusk Street, Boise, ID, 83706 Steve Knick USGS, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Snake River Field Station, 970 Lusk Street, Boise, ID, 83706 Southwest Regional GAP Project RS/GIS Laboratory, College of Natural Resources, UMC 5275, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-5275 NatureServe: NatureServe, 2400 Spruce St., Suite 201, Bolder, CO 80302 USGS/EROS Data Center: EROS Data Center, USGS, Sioux Falls, SD 57198
Description: These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently and historically by bull trout (salvelinus confluentus) populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually.These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific National Hydrography dataset. Data were migrated to the NHD in 2014. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The dataset originated from a GIS layer (2001) that was developed by ODFW's Bull Trout Coordinator, Mary Hanson. Additions and modifications were made during the Natural Resource Information Management Program's 24K Project which were limited to the current anadromous zones of the state.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B4051FA78-6A76-4F1E-B1CE-4451EE498F2F%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/data%20libraries/files/ODFW/ODFW_838_5_fhd_bulltrout_shp.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: ODFW, Mary Hanson, Jon Bowers, Ruth Schellbach as data processors. Numerous ODFW and other agency biollogists provided observation-based information to make the development of this dataset possible.
Description: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution.
These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently or historically by wild, natural, and/or hatchery fish populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. Historical habitat includes suitable habitat that fish no longer access and will not access in the foreseeable future without human intervention. Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BEF2D0D5F-20BA-419D-BDF8-16377FDB42B9%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/nrimp/pub/gis/k24/shape/distrib/fhd_anad_current_and_historical_shp.zip
Description: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution.These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently or historically by wild, natural, and/or hatchery fish populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. Historical habitat includes suitable habitat that fish no longer access and will not access in the foreseeable future without human intervention. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually. These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Historical habitat distribution data are now within the scope of the standard and are identified via the habitat use (fhdUseType) attribute. Historical habitats are only identified outside of currently accessible habitat and are not comprehensive.Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are now mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1996 to 2014.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BEF2D0D5F-20BA-419D-BDF8-16377FDB42B9%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/nrimp/pub/gis/k24/shape/distrib/fhd_anad_current_and_historical_shp.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach, David L. Bradford. Numerous fisheries biologists from ODFW as well as other natural resource agencies and tribes have contributed toward the development of these data. Data originator names are attributed at the feature level.
Description: The Pacific lamprey has inhabited the rivers, streams and coastal waters of the west for 350 million years (BPA, 2005). These data describe areas of suitable habitat currently and historically used by Pacific lamprey populations. Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, (more recently identified as Entosphenus tridentatus), are native to the Pacific coast from Baja California to the Bering Sea. They are anadromous, migrating from their natal stream to the ocean and back, but unlike salmon, Pacific lamprey spend well over half of their total life cycle in freshwater. The Pacific lamprey was listed as an Oregon State sensitive species in 1993 and in 1996 was protected through restriction of harvest (ODFW 2006). These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. This information is based on sampling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually.Habitat distribution data are mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1990 to 2011.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B85405E59-75D8-4F71-A209-64915F9DB84C%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/data%20libraries/files/ODFW/ODFW_997_5_fhd_pacific_lamprey_shp.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach
Description: These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently and historically by redband trout populations. Columbia River redband trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri, a subspecies of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, is native to the Fraser and Columbia River drainages, east of the Cascade Mountains to barrier falls on the Pend Oreille, Spokane, Snake and Kootenai rivers (Allendorf et al. 1980; Behnke 1992). Northern Great Basin redband trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss newberrii, are found in the closed basins of south-central Oregon as well as the Upper Klamath Lake basin. While Upper Klamath Lake now drains to the ocean, redband trout in the basin had ancestors that came from interior connections to the Great Basin and not from connections to the ocean (Behnke 1992).Redband trout, for the purposes of habitat distribution mapping, are generally defined as stream-resident O. mykiss gairdneri; migration is confined within their natal stream or watershed while steelhead, or the anadromous life form of O.mykiss gairdneri, migrate from their natal stream to the ocean and back. It is recognized, that while redband and steelhead habitat distribution datasets are published separately, overlapping areas represent the same subspecies.The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually.These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1996 to 2011.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B1A417E41-1A71-4942-B885-1AFBE4D888AB%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/data%20libraries/files/ODFW/ODFW_996_5_fhd_redband20120913.zip
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach
Description: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution.These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently or historically by wild, natural, and/or hatchery fish populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. Historical habitat includes suitable habitat that fish no longer access and will not access in the foreseeable future without human intervention. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually. These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Historical habitat distribution data are now within the scope of the standard and are identified via the habitat use (fhdUseType) attribute. Historical habitats are only identified outside of currently accessible habitat and are not comprehensive.Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are now mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1996 to 2014.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BEF2D0D5F-20BA-419D-BDF8-16377FDB42B9%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/nrimp/pub/gis/k24/shape/distrib/fhd_anad_current_and_historical_shp.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach, David L. Bradford. Numerous fisheries biologists from ODFW as well as other natural resource agencies and tribes have contributed toward the development of these data. Data originator names are attributed at the feature level.
Description: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution.These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently or historically by wild, natural, and/or hatchery fish populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. Historical habitat includes suitable habitat that fish no longer access and will not access in the foreseeable future without human intervention. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually. These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Historical habitat distribution data are now within the scope of the standard and are identified via the habitat use (fhdUseType) attribute. Historical habitats are only identified outside of currently accessible habitat and are not comprehensive.Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are now mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1996 to 2014.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BEF2D0D5F-20BA-419D-BDF8-16377FDB42B9%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/nrimp/pub/gis/k24/shape/distrib/fhd_anad_current_and_historical_shp.zip
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach, David L. Bradford. Numerous fisheries biologists from ODFW as well as other natural resource agencies and tribes have contributed toward the development of these data. Data originator names are attributed at the feature level.
Description: Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution.These data describe areas of suitable habitat believed to be used currently or historically by wild, natural, and/or hatchery fish populations. The term "currently" is defined as within the past five reproductive cycles. Historical habitat includes suitable habitat that fish no longer access and will not access in the foreseeable future without human intervention. This information is based on sampling, the best professional opinion of Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife or other natural resources agency staff biologists or modeling (see the fhdBasis field). Due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, or other environmental factors, some habitats identified may not be used annually. These data now comply with the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard that was adopted by the Oregon Geographic Information Council in February 2011. The Standard document can be found at: http://gis.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/standards/docs/OregonFishHabitatDistributionDataStandardv2.pdf Historical habitat distribution data are now within the scope of the standard and are identified via the habitat use (fhdUseType) attribute. Historical habitats are only identified outside of currently accessible habitat and are not comprehensive.Key features of the Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data include: species, run, life history, habitat use, origin, production, the basis for each record, originator name, originator entity and reference. Habitat distribution data are now mapped at a 1:24,000 scale statewide and are based on the Pacific Northwest Framework Hydrography dataset. The data are made available as GIS files in both shapefile and ESRI geodatabase format. The data were developed over an extensive time period ranging from 1996 to 2014.
Metadata
http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7BEF2D0D5F-20BA-419D-BDF8-16377FDB42B9%7D
Download
https://nrimp.dfw.state.or.us/web%20stores/nrimp/pub/gis/k24/shape/distrib/fhd_anad_current_and_historical_shp.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Jon K. Bowers, Ruth Schellbach, David L. Bradford. Numerous fisheries biologists from ODFW as well as other natural resource agencies and tribes have contributed toward the development of these data. Data originator names are attributed at the feature level.
Name: Fish Passage Barriers Removed Replaced (2012)
Display Field: fpbrevdt
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPoint
Description: The Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) dataset contains barriers to fish passage in Oregon watercourses. Barriers include the following types of natural or artificial structures: bridges, cascades, culverts, dams, debris jams, fords, natural falls, tide gates, and weirs. The OFPBDS dataset does not include structures which are not associated with in-stream features (such as dikes, levees or berms). Barriers are structures which do, or potentially may, impede fish movement and migration. Barriers can be known to cause complete or partial blockage to fish passage, or they can be completely passable, or they may have an unknown passage status. This dataset complies with version 1.1 of the OFBPDS data standard. New optional attributes have been added to describe fish passage barrier feature modifications, to describe supplementary information (via a comments field) and also to linear reference the barrier features to the National Hydrography Dataset. The OFPBDS dataset now contains over 40,000 barrier features from 19 separate sources including: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Department of Water Resources (OWRD), Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Forest Service, Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington county, Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins. The Data Steward obtained fish passage barrier data from multiple data originators between 2008 and 2016, collaborated with them to develop inclusion / exclusion criteria and dataset specific crosswalks for converting data from its original data structure to the structure of the OFPBDS. The data were then converted into the OFPBDS format and analyzed for duplication with existing OFPBDS barrier features. Where duplicates were identified, depending upon the scenario, one feature was either chosen over the other or in some cases attributes from different sources are combined. Source information is retained for each feature. The data were then loaded into the OFPBDS database. Barrier features were linear referenced (Framework Hydro only which is outside of the standard) and the corresponding optional attribute elements were populated. The data conversion, duplication reconciliation and linear referencing protocols are documented in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Management Plan. A separate dataset containing fish passage barrier features that have been completely removed or replaced (e.g. dam removals and culvert replacements) is published simultaneously with the OFPBDS dataset. The OFPBDS database is the most comprehensive compilation of fish passage barrier information in Oregon however, it does NOT represent a complete and current record of every fish passage barrier within the state. Efforts to address deficiencies in data currency, completeness and accuracy are ongoing and are often limited by lack of sufficient resources. Attributes (including key attributes such as fish passage status) are often unknown or incomplete. Consistency in attribution also varies among data originators. Field verification of barrier features and their attributes will be an important component to making this dataset current, comprehensive and accurate. Fish passage status is a key attribute. Many barrier features have an unknown passage status. For other features, the passage status may have changed since it was originally documented. Note that this metadata file is best viewed in ArcCatalog. Documentation for the OFPBDS can be found online at http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/docs/bioscience/OregonFishPassageBarrierDataStandardv1dot1.pdf.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Barrier features originate primarily from the following agencies: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Department of Water Resources (OWRD), Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Forest Service, Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington county, Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins.
Description: The Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard (OFPBDS) dataset contains barriers to fish passage in Oregon watercourses. Barriers include the following types of natural or artificial structures: bridges, cascades, culverts, dams, debris jams, fords, natural falls, tide gates, and weirs. The OFPBDS dataset does not include structures which are not associated with in-stream features (such as dikes, levees or berms). Barriers are structures which do, or potentially may, impede fish movement and migration. Barriers can be known to cause complete or partial blockage to fish passage, or they can be completely passable, or they may have an unknown passage status. This dataset complies with version 1.1 of the OFBPDS data standard. New optional attributes have been added to describe fish passage barrier feature modifications, to describe supplementary information (via a comments field) and also to linear reference the barrier features to the National Hydrography Dataset. The OFPBDS dataset now contains over 40,000 barrier features from 19 separate sources including: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Department of Water Resources (OWRD), Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Forest Service, Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington county, Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins. The Data Steward obtained fish passage barrier data from multiple data originators between 2008 and 2016, collaborated with them to develop inclusion / exclusion criteria and dataset specific crosswalks for converting data from its original data structure to the structure of the OFPBDS. The data were then converted into the OFPBDS format and analyzed for duplication with existing OFPBDS barrier features. Where duplicates were identified, depending upon the scenario, one feature was either chosen over the other or in some cases attributes from different sources are combined. Source information is retained for each feature. The data were then loaded into the OFPBDS database. Barrier features were linear referenced (Framework Hydro only which is outside of the standard) and the corresponding optional attribute elements were populated. The data conversion, duplication reconciliation and linear referencing protocols are documented in the Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Management Plan. A separate dataset containing fish passage barrier features that have been completely removed or replaced (e.g. dam removals and culvert replacements) is published simultaneously with the OFPBDS dataset. The OFPBDS database is the most comprehensive compilation of fish passage barrier information in Oregon however, it does NOT represent a complete and current record of every fish passage barrier within the state. Efforts to address deficiencies in data currency, completeness and accuracy are ongoing and are often limited by lack of sufficient resources. Attributes (including key attributes such as fish passage status) are often unknown or incomplete. Consistency in attribution also varies among data originators. Field verification of barrier features and their attributes will be an important component to making this dataset current, comprehensive and accurate. Fish passage status is a key attribute. Many barrier features have an unknown passage status. For other features, the passage status may have changed since it was originally documented. Note that this metadata file is best viewed in ArcCatalog. Documentation for the OFPBDS can be found online at http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/EISPD/GEO/docs/bioscience/OregonFishPassageBarrierDataStandardv1dot1.pdf.
Copyright Text: Barrier features originate primarily from the following agencies: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Oregon Department of Water Resources (OWRD), Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF), Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) US Bureau of Land Management (BLM), US Forest Service, Nez Perce Tribe, Benton SWCD, Washington county, Lower Columbia River Estuary Partnership and watershed councils representing the Rogue, Umpqua, Siuslaw, Santiam, Calapooia, Clackamas and Scapoose basins.
Description: The Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is a geodatabase, managed by USGS GAP, that illustrates and describes public land ownership, management and other conservation lands, including voluntarily provided privately protected areas. The State, Regional and LCC geodatabases contain two feature classes. The PADUS1_3_FeeEasement feature class and the national MPA feature class. Legitimate and other protected area overlaps exist in the full inventory, with Easements loaded on top of Fee. Parcel data within a protected area are dissolved in this file that powers the PAD-US Viewer. As overlaps exist, GAP creates separate analytical layers to summarize area statistics for "GAP Status Code" and "Owner Name". Contact the PAD-US Coordinator for more information. The lands included in PAD-US are assigned conservation measures that qualify their intent to manage lands for the preservation of biological diversity and to other natural, recreational and cultural uses; managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The geodatabase includes: 1) Geographic boundaries of public land ownership and voluntarily provided private conservation lands (e.g., Nature Conservancy Preserves); 2) The combination land owner, land manager, management designation or type, parcel name, GIS Acres and source of geographic information of each mapped land unit 3) GAP Status Code conservation measure of each parcel based on USGS National Gap Analysis Program (GAP) protection level categories which provide a measurement of management intent for long-term biodiversity conservation 4) IUCN category for a protected area's inclusion into UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre's World Database for Protected Areas. IUCN protected areas are defined as, "A clearly defined geographical space, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values" and are categorized following a classification scheme available through USGS GAP; 5) World Database of Protected Areas (WDPA) Site Codes linking the multiple parcels of a single protected area in PAD-US and connecting them to the Global Community. As legitimate and other overlaps exist in the combined inventory GAP creates separate analytical layers to obtain area statistics for "GAP Status Code" and "Owner Name". PAD-US version 1.3 Combined updates include: 1) State, local government and private protected area updates delivered September 2011 from PAD-US State Data Stewards: CO (Colorado State University), FL (Florida Natural Areas Inventory), ID (Idaho Fish and Game), MA (The Commonwealth's Office of Geographic Information Systems, MassGIS), MO (University of Missouri, MoRAP), MT (Montana Natural Heritage Program), NM (Natural Heritage New Mexico), OR (Oregon Natural Heritage Program), VA (Department of Conservation and Recreation, Virginia Natural Heritage Program). 2) Select local government (i.e. county, city) protected areas (3,632) across the country (to complement the current PAD-US inventory) aggregated by the Trust for Public Land (TPL) for their Conservation Almanac that tracks the conservation finance movement across the country. 3) A new Date of Establishment field that identifies the year an area was designated or otherwise protected, attributed for 86% of GAP Status Code 1 and 2 protected areas. Additional dates will be provided in future updates. 4) A national wilderness area update from wilderness.net 5) The Access field that describes public access to protected areas as defined by data stewards or categorical assignment by Primary Designation Type. . The new Access Source field documents local vs. categorical assignments. See the PAD-US Standard Manual for more information: gapanalysis.usgs.gov/padus 6) The transfer of conservation measures (i.e. GAP Status Codes, IUCN Categories) and documentation (i.e. GAP Code Source, GAP Code Date) from PAD-US version 1.2 or categorical assignments (see PAD-US Standard) when not provided by data stewards 7) Integration of non-sensitive National Conservation Easement Database (NCED) easements from August 2011, July 2012 with PAD-US version 1.2 easements. Duplicates were removed, unless 'Stacked' = Y and multiple easements exist. 8) Unique ID's transferred from NCED or requested for new easements. NCED and PAD-US are linked via Source UID in the PAD-US version 1.3 Easement feature class. 9) Official (member and eligible) MPAs from the NOAA MPA Inventory (March 2011, www.mpa.gov) translated into the PAD-US schema with conservation measures transferred from PAD-US version 1.2 or categorically assigned to new protected areas. Contact the PAD-US Coordinator for documentation of categorical GAP Status Code assignments for MPAs. 10) Identified MPA records that overlap existing protected areas in the PAD-US Fee feature class (i.e. PADUS Overlap field in MPA feature class). For example, many National Wildlife Refuges and National Parks are also MPAs and are represented in the PAD-US MPA and Fee feature classes.
Metadata http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id={1A95CDE7-7C27-46FF-9E02-785C8AAF6DB7}
Download
http://orbic.pdx.edu/documents/OR_stewardship.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: ORBIC Stewardship Geodatabase. December 2013. Modified from: US Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Program (GAP). November 2012. Protected Areas Database of the United States (PADUS), version 1.4.
own_name
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Owner Name, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[0100: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)]
, [0110: Bureau of Land Management (BLM)]
, [0115: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (DOI)]
, ...54 more...
)
loc_own
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Local Owner, length: 100
)
status
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Status, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[Designated: Designated - Legally or administratively decreed]
, [Proposed: Proposed - local government level approval]
, [Other: Other - Site is recognized in a manner not otherwise classified]
, ...1 more...
)
state_nm
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: State Name, length: 50
, Coded Values:
[10: Delaware]
, [11: District of Columbia]
, [12: Florida]
, ...58 more...
)
Description: This Oregon Wetlands Cover was created by Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center and The Wetlands Conservancy. It is a compilation of polygon data from numerous sources, and represents the most comprehensive dataset available for the location and composition of the state's wetlands. This layer is intended to (1) serve as a framework for storing and disseminating information on the state's wetlands, and (2) promote comprehensive monitoring, assessment, conservation, and restoration of Oregon's greatest wetlands. Cowardin designation is based on Oregon Wetland Mapping Standard (OWMS), Version 2.0 Draft, March 2009. Metadata
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/metadata/wetlands_or.htm
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/Wetland_OR.zip
Name: Public Land Survey System Quarter-quarter Reference Grid (2007)
Display Field: meridian
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: This layer is based on the US Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Geographic Coordinate Data Base (GCDB) coordinate data where it exists in Oregon. The remaining area not covered by the GCDB has been filled in with transformed data snapped to the BLM's section grid.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Bureau of Land Management, Oregon Water Resources Department.
Description: This report publishes a geologic digital spatial database (ORGEO) for the geologic map of Oregon by Walker and MacLeod (1991) which was originally printed on a single sheet of paper at a scale of 1:500,000 and accompanied by a second sheet for map unit descriptions and ancillary data. The spatial digital database (GIS) provided in this report supersedes an earlier digital edition by Raines and others (1996). The dataset was projected to the Oregon Lambert Projection.
Metadata
http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/metadata/OrGeology.htm
Download
http://oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataForDownload/ORE_Geology.zip
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 10 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Min. Scale: 100000.0 Max. Scale: 0.0 Label Placement: esriServerPolygonPlacementAlwaysHorizontal Label Expression: [MAP_UNIT] Use Coded Values: true Symbol:
Color: [0, 0, 0, 255] Background Color: N/A Outline Color: N/A Vertical Alignment: bottom Horizontal Alignment: center Right to Left: false Angle: 0 XOffset: 0 YOffset: 0 Size: 8 Font Family: Tahoma Font Style: normal Font Weight: normal Font Decoration: none
Description: This data set is a combined coverage including detailed SSURGO data where available, and STATSGO data where SSURGO data is not available. Consult the web soil survey website for complete metadata for SSURGO soil surveys and the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data set. STATSGO abstract: This data set consists of general soil association units. It was
developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey and supersedes
the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) data set published in 1994.
It consists of a broad based inventory of soils and nonsoil areas
that occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can
be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. The data set was
created by generalizing more detailed soil survey maps. Where more
detailed soil survey maps were not available, data on geology,
topography, vegetation, and climate were assembled, together with
Land Remote Sensing Satellite (LANDSAT) images. Soils of like areas
were studied, and the probable classification and extent of the soils
were determined.
Map unit composition was determined by transecting or sampling areas
on the more detailed maps and expanding the data statistically to
characterize the whole map unit.
This data set consists of georeferenced vector digital data and
tabular digital data. The map data were collected in 1-by 2-degree
topographic quadrangle units and merged into a seamless national
data set. It is distributed in state/territory and national extents.
The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil
Information System data base which gives the proportionate extent of
the component soils and their properties.
SSURGO abstract: This data set is a digital soil survey and generally is the most detailed level of soil geographic data developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey. The information was prepared by digitizing maps, by compiling information onto a planimetric correct base and digitizing, or by revising digitized maps using remotely sensed and other information. This data set consists of georeferenced digital map data and computerized attribute data. The map data are in a soil survey area extent format and include a detailed, field verified inventory of soils and miscellaneous areas that normally occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped. A special soil features layer (point and line features) is optional. This layer displays the location of features too small to delineate at the mapping scale, but they are large enough and contrasting enough to significantly influence use and management. The soil map units are linked to attributes in the National Soil Information System relational database, which gives the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.
For data quality, attribute accuracy, and process steps, see detailed metadata available from Web Soil Survey.
Metadata for this compilation: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B6DCF40D8-6B89-4D69-BDD1-EDEC941C4D72%7D
Download ftp://ftp.gis.oregon.gov/geoscience/Soils_framework_data/OGIC_SSURGO_STATSGO_20150309.zip
Description: This feature class is a polygon version of the SB 379 tsunami regulatory line/zone created in 1995 for the entire Oregon coast. This file is for GIS purposes only.This publication is supplemental to DOGAMI Open File Report O-00-05, Digital reissue of tsunami hazard maps of coastal quadrangles orginally mandated by Senate Bill 379 (1995) by George Priest, 2000.
Metadata: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B72267A85-9D38-4090-9AFE-0489F12F37FD%7D
Download: http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/Oregon%20Senate%20Bill%20379%20(SB%20379)%20Tsunami%20Regulatory%20Line%202014.zip
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: This feature class is created from tsunami work performed by George Priest, Geologist, for the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, and published in 1995. See DOGAMI Open-File Report O-95-67, Explanation of Mapping Methods and Use of the Tsunami Hazard Maps of the Oregon Coast, by George Priest, 1995.
Description: The data in this raster depicts landslide susceptibility at a 10 meter resolution, across the state of Oregon. The data was created using Oregon Lidar Consortium (OLC) data, and USGS NED data where OLC data was not present. This elevation data was converted into slopes, and a multi pronged analysis process used these slopes, geology and mapped existing landslides to create this 10 meter raster. There are 4 classes of landslide susceptibility: Low, Moderate, High and Very High.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: William J. Burns, Kate Mickelson, and Ian P. Madin, Oregon Dept. of Geology & Mineral Industries
Description: Wildland Urban Interface areas are intended to delineate those areas in which residential dwellings come in contact with areas that are prone to, or at risk of, wildfire.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Compiled by the Oregon Department of Forestry from data provided by ODF district offices and Oregon counties.
Description: The evacuation zones are the local and distant tsunami scenarios shown on the tsunami evacuation brochures which can be found on the Oregon Tsunami Clearinghouse web site: www.oregontsunami.org The local tsunami evacuation zone is equal to the XXL tsunami scenario. The distant tsunami evacuation zone is equal to the AKMax tsunami scenario. DOGAMI modeled 7 tsunami scenarios altogether; 5 local tsunami events (S, M, L, XL, and XXL) and 2 distant tsunami events (AK64 and AKMax). These are the worst case scenarios for a local and distant earthquake/tsunami event. These polygons represent the evacuation zones for the entire Oregon coast.All 7 tsunami scenarios, along with a text report and other supplemental files, can be found in DOGAMI publication: OFR O-13-19, Summary of Tsunami Hazard Data for Oregon.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: George R. Priest (1), Robert C. Witter (2), Y. Joseph Zhang (3), Kelin Wang (4), Chris Goldfinger (5), Laura L. Stimely (1), John English (6), Sean G. Pickner (7), Kaleena L.B. Hughes (7), Taylore E. Wille (7), and Rachel L. Smith (7)
1) Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Coastal Field Office, 313 SW 2nd Street, Suite D, Newport, Oregon 97365
2) U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Dr., Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
3) Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Center for Coastal Resources Management, 1375 Greate Road, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, VA 23062
4) Geological Survey of Canada, Pacific Geoscience Centre, Room 4714m, 9860 West Saanich Road, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 4B2
5) College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Ocean Admin. Bldg. 104, Corvallis, Oregon 97331
6) City of Hillsboro, Information Services, Civic Center 150 E. Main Street, Hillsboro, Oregon, 97123
7) Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon Street, #28, Suite 965, Portland, OR 97232
Name: Statewide Flood Hazard Database Letter of Map Change Locations (2015)
Display Field: county
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPoint
Description: The FEMA_LOMC feature class is a compilation of FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMC) Locations for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMC) Locations were downloaded from the FEMA Map Service Center Website. The LOMC points were precisely located using county-level assessor data, orthoimagery, and lidar hillshades.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Name: Statewide Flood Hazard Database Base Flood Elevation Lines (2015)
Display Field: bfe_ln_id
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolyline
Description: The FEMA_BFE feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study base flood elevation (BFE) lines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study base flood elevation (BFE) lines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and georeferenced paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The FEMA_PROFIL_BASLN feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study profile baselines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study profile baselines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The FEMA_XS feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study cross section (XS) lines for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study cross section (XS) lines were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Name: Statewide Flood Hazard Database Inundation Zones (2015)
Display Field: fld_ar_id
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolygon
Description: The FEMA_FLD_HAZ_AR feature class is a compilation of FEMA Flood Insurance Study inundation zones for the state of Oregon. The FEMA Flood Insurance Study inundation zones were derived from Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps and georeferenced paper Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Name: Statewide Flood Hazard Database Observed Inundation High Water Marks (2015)
Display Field: event_name
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPoint
Description: The HWM_POINTS feature class is a compilation of high water marks from flood events for the state of Oregon.
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The NW_Oregon_1996_Inundation feature class represents 1996 flood inundation area in northwest Oregon.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The Willamette_Basin_1943_Inundation feature class represents 1943 flood inundation area in the Willamette Basin
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The Willamette_River_1861_Inundation feature class represents 1861 flood inundation area primarily associated with the Willamette River
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
Description: The Willamette_River_1964_Inundation feature class represents 1964 flood inundation area primarily associated with the Willamette River
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: The Statewide Flood Hazard Database for Oregon was funded by the Oregon Geospatial Enterprise Office. It is an official Hazards Framework Implementation Team (FIT) theme.
fcode: Coded Values:
[50300: Sounding Datum Line]
, [50301: Sounding Datum Line: Positional Accuracy = Approximate]
, [50302: Sounding Datum Line: Positional Accuracy = Definite]
ID: 568
Name: Levee
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[56800: Levee]
ID: 369
Name: Gate
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[36900: Gate]
ID: 362
Name: Flume
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[36200: Flume]
ID: 487
Name: Waterfall
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[48700: Waterfall]
ID: 434
Name: Reef
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[43400: Reef]
ID: 533
Name: Special Use Zone Limit
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[53300: Special Use Zone Limit]
, [53301: Special Use Zone Limit: Positional Accuracy = Definite]
, [53302: Special Use Zone Limit: Positional Accuracy = Indefinite]
ID: 450
Name: SinkRise
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[45000: Sink/Rise]
ID: 431
Name: Rapids
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[43100: Rapids]
ID: 343
Name: DamWeir
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[34300: Dam/Weir]
, [34305: Dam/Weir: Construction Material = Earthen]
, [34306: Dam/Weir: Construction Material = Nonearthen]
fcode: Coded Values:
[53700: Area of Complex Channels]
ID: 398
Name: Lock Chamber
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[39800: Lock Chamber]
ID: 454
Name: Special Use Zone
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[45400: Special Use Zone]
, [45402: Special Use Zone: Special Use Zone Type = Dump Site; Operational Status = Abandoned]
, [45401: Special Use Zone: Special Use Zone Type = Dump Site; Operational Status = Operational]
, ...2 more...
ID: 455
Name: Spillway
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[45500: Spillway]
ID: 362
Name: Flume
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[36200: Flume]
ID: 343
Name: DamWeir
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[34300: Dam/Weir]
, [34305: Dam/Weir: Construction Material = Earthen]
, [34306: Dam/Weir: Construction Material = Nonearthen]
ID: 485
Name: Water IntakeOutflow
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[48500: Water Intake/Outflow]
ID: 307
Name: Area to be Submerged
Domains:
resolution: Inherited
elevation: Inherited
fcode: Coded Values:
[30700: Area to be Submerged]
Description: WBDHU2: This geospatial dataset represents the 1st level (2-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries of the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. It was created by dissolving boundaries from the finer resolution hydrologic units to create these broader boundaries. See metadata for the wbdpoly feature class for a more complete description of the WBD. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: WBDHU4: This geospatial dataset represents the 2nd level (4-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries of the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. It was created by dissolving boundaries from the finer resolution hydrologic units to create these broader boundaries. See metadata for the wbdhu12 feature class for a more complete description of the WBD. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: WBDHU6: This geospatial dataset represents the 3rd level (6-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries of the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. It was created by dissolving boundaries from the finer resolution hydrologic units to create these broader boundaries. See metadata for the wbd12 feature class for a more complete description of the WBD. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: WBDHU8: This geospatial dataset represents the 4th level (8-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries of the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. It was created by dissolving boundaries from the finer resolution hydrologic units to create these broader boundaries. See metadata for the wbdhu12 feature class for a more complete description of the WBD. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: WBD_HU10: This geospatial dataset represents the 5th level (10-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries from the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. Hydrologic units within the WBDHU10 represent drainage areas delineated to the 5th level drainage systems. Their boundaries are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream, or similar surface waters. Hydrologic units within the WBDHU10 can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. Boundaries within the WBDHU10 were delineated by Pacific Northwest (PNW) Hydrography Framework Partners to meet state requirements and to contribute to the national WBD repository. To meet these goals, the WBD must adhere to the "Federal Standards for Delineation of Hydrologic Unit Boundaries", dated October, 2004. These HUC_10 boundaries were made from the Oregon dataset that has been given national certification by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Prior to submission the dataset was subjected to an iterative review and edit process to ensure that the hydrologic boundaries fully satisfy the federal standards. This work was completed under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Pacific Northwest Hydrography Framework Partnership and the US Geological Survey (USGS). The current dataset includes 5th level boundaries that are in all 4th level (8-digit) subbasins that fall within or intersect the Oregon state boundary. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: WBD_HU12: This geospatial dataset represents the 6th level (12-digit) hydrologic unit boundaries from the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon. Hydrologic units within the WBD_OR_HUC_12 represent drainage areas delineated to the 6th level drainage systems. Their boundaries are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream, or similar surface waters. Hydrologic units within the WBD_OR_HUC_12 can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. Boundaries within the WBD_OR_HUC_12 were delineated by Pacific Northwest (PNW) Hydrography Framework Partners to meet state requirements and to contribute to the national WBD repository. To meet these goals, the WBD must adhere to the "Federal Standards for Delineation of Hydrologic Unit Boundaries", dated October, 2004. These HUC_12 boundaries were made from the Oregon dataset that has been given national certification by Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Prior to submission the dataset was subjected to an iterative review and edit process to ensure that the hydrologic boundaries fully satisfy the federal standards. This work was completed under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Pacific Northwest Hydrography Framework Partnership and the US Geological Survey (USGS). The current dataset includes all 6th level boundaries that are in all 4th level (8-digit) subbasins that fall within or intersect the Oregon state boundary. USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Name: Watershed Boundary Dataset Line 6th Level 12 Digit Hydrologic Unit (2017)
Display Field: tnmid
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPolyline
Description: WBDLine: This geospatial dataset represents arcs for the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) layer for Oregon and it contains complete coverage of hydrologic boundaries, mapped to the 6th level (12-digit). The arcs for each boundary are defined by hydrographic and topographic criteria that delineate an area of land upstream from a specific point on a river, stream, or similar surface waters. Hydrologic units within the WBD can accept surface water directly from upstream drainage areas, and indirectly from associated surface areas such as remnant, non-contributing, and diversions to form a drainage area with single or multiple outlet points. These arcs for the Oregon WBD were delineated by Pacific Northwest (PNW) Hydrography Framework Partners to meet state requirements and to contribute to the national WBD repository. To meet these goals, the WBD must adhere to the "Federal Standards for Delineation of Hydrologic Unit Boundaries", dated October, 2004. The Oregon dataset has been given national certification by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Prior to submission the dataset was subjected to an iterative review and edit process to ensure that the hydrologic boundaries fully satisfy the federal standards. This work was completed under a Memorandum of Understanding between the Pacific Northwest Hydrography Framework Partnership and the US Geological Survey (USGS). USGS Federal Standards and Procedures for the National Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) located here: http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11/a3/pdf/tm11-a3.pdf
Description: The National Land Cover Database products are created through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies (www.mrlc.gov), consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the National Park Service (NPS), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The success of NLCD over nearly two decades is credited to the continuing collaborative spirit of the agencies that make up the MRLC. NLCD 2011 is the most up-to-date iteration of the National Land Cover Database, the definitive Landsat-based, 30-meter resolution land cover database for the Nation. The data in NLCD 2011 are completely integrated with NLCD 2001 (2011 Edition) and NLCD 2006 (2011 Edition). For NLCD 2011, there are 5 primary data products: 1) NLCD 2011 Land Cover; 2) NLCD 2006/2011 Land Cover Change Pixels labeled with the 2011 land cover class; 3) NLCD 2011 Percent Developed Imperviousness; 4) NLCD 2006/2011 Percent Developed Imperviousness Change Pixels; and 5) NLCD 2011 Tree Canopy Cover provided by an MRLC partner - the U.S.D.A. Forest Service Remote Sensing Applications Center. In addition, ancillary metadata includes the NLCD 2011 Path/Row Index vector file showing the footprint of Landsat scenes and change analysis pairs used to derive 2006/2011 spectral change. All Landsat scene acquisition dates are included in the attribute table. Also, as part of the NLCD 2011 project, NLCD 2001 and 2006 land cover and impervious data products have been revised and reissued (2011 Edition) to provide full compatibility with the new NLCD 2011 products. NLCD Tree Canopy Cover was created using MRLC mapping zones from NLCD 2001 (see Tree Canopy Cover metadata for additional detail). All other NLCD 2011 products were created on a path/row basis and mosaicked to create a seamless national product. Questions about the NLCD 2011 land cover product can be directed to the NLCD 2011 land cover mapping team at the USGS/EROS, Sioux Falls, SD (605) 594-6151 or mrlc@usgs.gov. This raster is clipped to include only Oregon.
Metadata: http://spatialdata.oregonexplorer.info/geoportal/rest/document?id=%7B81916EE1-B2B7-41C0-AACB-814EE8E73AF9%7D
Download: http://oe.oregonexplorer.info/ExternalContent/SpatialDataforDownload/OR_NLCD_2011.zip
Description: This file contains the locations for all hospitals currently operating within the State of Oregon, and facilities in Washington and Idaho which are within 60 minutes by car of the Oregon border. The source list for these location is located at:Oregon Hospitals: S:\Offices\Salem (500 Summer St)\OHPR Research Unit\DATA-Hospitals\HDD\Hosptial info\Hospital List 2013.xlsxWashington & Idaho Hospitals: Contact Mike Greenwald (503-945-6759; e-mail: MICHAEL.GREENWALD@dhsoha.state.or.us)The list was geocoded using the following geocoders:Oregon Hospitals: TeleAtlas geocoder provided by ESRI technical support http://tasks.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/services/Locators/TA_Streets_US10 Washington & Idaho Hospitals: ESRI/Dynamap Street_Addresses_US Dual Range geocoder provided by ESRI as part of August 2013 Oregon Health Authority data updateSummary stats for performance:N=72 locations--68 Automatic Match (Min Score=78.32), 4 manually placed points (2 candidates identified by correcting addres typos, 2 identified from Google Streetview)
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Hospital Address Table:
Oregon Records: Steve Ranzoni (503-945-6678; e-mail: STEVEN.RANZONI@dhsoha.state.or.us)
Washington & Idaho Records: Compiled by Mike Greenwald (503-945-6759; e-mail: MICHAEL.GREENWALD@dhsoha.state.or.us) from information on American Hospital Association website (http://www.ahadataviewer.com/quickreport/ )
Hospital Geocoding--Mike Greenwald (503-945-6759; e-mail: MICHAEL.GREENWALD@dhsoha.state.or.us)
Description: Large dams are defined by a dam height >= 10 feet and storage of >= 9.2 acre feet. These larger dams are within the juristiction of Oregon Water Resource Department. Large dams that are not managed by OWRD are considered "Non-Fee Dams" (apply_fee = 'NO')
Description: OR-Trans is a GIS road centerline dataset compiled from numerous sources of data throughout the state. Each dataset is from the road authority responsible for (or assigned data maintenace for) the road data each dataset contains. Data from each dataset is compiled into a statewide dataset that has the best avaialble data from each road authority for their jurisdiction (or assigned data maintenance responsibility). Data is stored in a SQL database and exported in numerous formats.
Service Item Id: b4da72b87a9547489338fc4748b90755
Copyright Text: Transportation Framework Implementation Team (T-FIT) and the Oregon Department of Transportation, GIS unit as the data steward.